Operationalizing Modern Enterprise Capabilities as a Service » APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) MULTI-CLOUD TRITON PLATFORM MANAGED SERVICES

This appears to be a poorly written requirement/feature. Has the government defined "relevant documentation"? What are tenant activities? Does 2Twelve need assistance get getting clarification regarding this requirement?

This requirement is part of the systems engineering transformation to modernization of moving from paper-based documentation to a more configuration-based documentation for cloud native infrastructure. This requirement focuses on the Triton platform that supports the application of the ORE so users can have a cloud native experience from a consumption perspective. With each update to the ORE requires update to the platform to support new features to ensure that the ORE maintains high availability to stakeholders consuming services. In a cloud native world, the platform updates with version releases, patches, to ensure proper integration with the feature builds that are being implemented in the ORE as part of task 2.
For example, different video formats will require the platform and object storage to be modified to enable faster upload and processing by the user on certain sized videos.
2 Twelve does not need assistance with this feature. We have experienced with cloud native platforms to update and support feature releases.
This requirement has enabled the government to have flexibility for requesting engineering documentation for features outside of the system.

Good Afternoon! Brent and I need to understand what "relevant documentation" is being updated. For example, what documents were uploaded that changed the percentile from 80 to 90% complete?

This includes updates to all the documentation as we do feature updates such as User Guides, NIST scans, API and architecture documentation, SEISA documentation, CONOPS, Use Cases, process documents, onboarding documents. Also includes what was provided to MR Trajan for AMA and DADMS.

We'd be happy to walk you through any of these specifically on one of our calls.

Can Brent and Gerald get an update on what's been done in terms of CONOPS and Use Cases?

Hi Gerald,
Our understanding was that Government was using input from our BCA and OTA pre production materials to develop a draft CONOPS for our input. However, our BCA has elements of the CONOPS and we can add the Gaps to assist Gov with the CONOPS to tailor it to the organization structure or Modern Service Delivery (MSD). We are also working to draft a visual that will be leveraged as an operational view to support CONOPS.

Please let us know if you need more assistance or if you want 2 Twelve to fill in other gaps. In that case we would need to set up another call to get more information on what the Government would require. We have industry expertise that would enable us to provide useful input on what government needs from an operations/sustainment perspective and the functions that need to be accounted (e.g. managing running code, cloud native applications, etc.)

Yes, the government (Brent) has shared the DRAFT CONOPS to 2Twelve for input. Awaiting status.

Great. We'll plan to discuss some feedback at the meeting today.